LONDON — The High Court of Justice has issued a gagging order forbidding the press from identifying a disgraced entertainment figure as anyone other than “a prominent 55-year-old children’s author whose name rhymes with Shmavid Shmalliams.”
The ruling, handed down by the Honourable Mr. Justice Archibald Throckmorton, KC, ensures that the British public will remain in a state of blissful ignorance regarding the identity of the 6-foot-2 comic who spent a decade sitting next to Simon Cowell, swam the English Channel for charity, and penned Gangsta Granny.
“The sanctity of our legal process depends entirely upon the nation agreeing to play along with this little game,” Justice Throckmorton declared from the bench. “Should the identity of this completely anonymous individual, who rose to fame on a sketch show called Little Something-or-Other alongside a gentleman named Matt Lucas, be made public, it would irreparably damage the reputation of a man whom none of us can possibly identify.”
Fleet Street editors immediately mobilized their legal compliance departments to scrub every publication of any clue that could compromise the shroud of judicial secrecy.
At The Daily Telegraph, editors worked through the night to replace all references to the accused with circumlocutions.
“We take our obligations to His Majesty’s judiciary with the utmost gravity,” explained Nigel Crump, senior legal counsel for the paper. “That is why our morning headline read: ‘Unidentified National Treasure Whose First Name Is An Anagram Of ‘Vidad’ In Court Over Unspecified Conduct.’ We also ran a front-page photograph with a three-millimeter black bar placed across his eyes. The public hasn’t the foggiest idea who it could be.”
Broadcasters across the country faced equally rigorous editorial hurdles. During the evening bulletin on BBC News, the anchor stared down the lens of the camera with the terrified expression of a hostage reading a ransom note.
“Turning now to legal news,” the newsreader intoned. “A certain well-known light entertainer, who may or may not have presented the National Television Awards, and whose middle name is officially recorded as Edward, has appeared before a judge regarding allegations that we are legally prevented from summarizing, involving actions we are forbidden from characterizing, at a time and place we cannot specify.”
Over at Sky News, producers scrambled to invite panel guests who were instructed to discuss the trending scandal in abstract philosophical riddles.
“It is a troubling day for British culture,” noted one cultural commentator on live air. “When an entertainer who is universally recognized as Britain’s best-selling author since J.K. Rowling finds himself at the center of such whispers, one can only wonder: who on earth could this completely unidentified individual be?”
While British institutions held the line of legal decorum, the antiquated decree faced friction from the global internet, where millions of social media users had already spent the morning tweeting the celebrity’s full name, high school yearbook photos, and current whereabouts.
At press time, legal representatives for the mystery television judge announced they were preparing to file an additional £500,000 emergency motion to prohibit utilizing the letters ‘D’ and ‘W’ in close proximity for the remainder of the calendar year.
We write the headlines that haven’t happened yet but probably will. Subscribe to The Rambutan for Southeast Asia’s sharpest fake news.